Several parts of Meghan Markle's case were dismissed by the courts today, but there's still a chance she could win her legal battle against the British tabloids.
that Meghan wrote to her father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018. The lawsuit seeks damages for the alleged misuse of private information, breach of data protection rights and copyright infringement.
The judge also made clear that none of the elements struck out are required in order for Meghan to win her claim. A spokesperson for Schillings, the law firm acting on behalf of Meghan, said in a statement on Friday that it will continue on with the case. "Whilst the Judge recognises that there is a claim for breach of privacy and copyright, we are surprised to see that his ruling suggests that dishonest behaviour is not relevant," the statement continues."We feel honesty and integrity are at the core of what matters; or as it relates to theand Associated Newspapers, their lack thereof.
South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Meghan Markle Loses First Round in U.K. Privacy ClaimMeghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has lost an early round in her privacy case against U.K. newspaper Mail on Sunday over its publication of a letter to her estranged father. Details:
Read more »
Meghan Markle loses first High Court fight against the Mail On SundayA judge ruled that part of her case should be struck out including claims that the publisher had behaved 'dishonestly'
Read more »
Meghan Markle loses first round of privacy lawsuit against British tabloid's publisherThe Duchess of Sussex is suing over private letters to her father, published by the British tabloid The Mail on Sunday.
Read more »
Meghan Markle Lost the First Part of Her Legal Battle Against British TabloidsMeghan Markle's legal battle is far from over.
Read more »
Meghan Markle Suffers a Setback in Legal Privacy Case Against the 'Daily Mail'Her lawyers said they were 'surprised' by the judge's decision.
Read more »