We look at the rocky path the legislation to protect people online has taken - and where it will go next.
The crux of the plan was to make Ofcom the new regulator of internet firms, with the power to fine them up to 10% of their global turnover if they failed to take down harmful content.
For technology companies, the fear was it would not be clear what they were expected to censor, and they demanded more clarity.- they were concerned the rule overreached and firms would err on the side of caution to avoid the hefty fines threatened by the government, leading to a direct threat to free speech.
Yet there was still no definition of the so-called legal harms - just the promise it would be set out in further legislation down the track.Instead of progressing though, the law was again hit by delays, this time due to the trials and tribulations within the Conservative Party. The future of the law was then up in the air, with a new leader set to take the keys to Downing Street.Boris Johnson handed the baton on to Liz truss, who did promise to keep the bill with "tweaks".
Ms Dorries also warned the frontbench should be prepared for"one mother of a massive fight" with female Tory MPs if the bill was watered down, attacking her successor Michelle Donelan in the House magazine, saying she had"been in the job five minutes and does not understand enough about it".Fast forward a month and it brings us to the government's new announcement - the bill is back and with some significant changes.
But instead of their legal but harmful duties, they will have to provide adults with tools to hide certain content they do not wish to see - such as posts related to eating disorders, misogyny and other forms of abuse.
South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Why changes to the Government's Online Safety Bill are controversialMeasures which would have forced big technology platforms to remove “legal but harmful” material have been axed from the Online Safety Bill ⬇️ emsferg explains
Read more »
i morning briefing: Can the Online Safety Bill really protect children?📨 i morning briefing: Can the Online Safety Bill really protect children? 📬 Sign up to our Early Edition newsletter here ⬇️
Read more »
Government denies weakening Online Safety BillNew law will not require removal of 'legal but harmful' content, which critics said risked free speech.
Read more »
Plan to make big tech remove harmful content axedMinister denies weakening the Online Safety Bill after dropping the 'legal but harmful' material measures.
Read more »
Online Safety laws forcing companies to take down 'legal but harmful' posts axed by governmentAs first revealed by i earlier this month, Culture Secretary Michelle Donelan is bringing forward changes to the Online Safety Bill when it returns to the Commons next week
Read more »