Opinion: We need politicians of Andrew Charlton’s calibre, but rank-and-file votes won’t always deliver them
The solid toiler or the future PM without roots in the local community? The local worthy or the blow-in on the make? These are choices bedevilling party preselections across politics on the eve of a likely May 14 federal election, less than two months from now.
This week the choice of Labor candidate for the diverse western Sydney seat of Parramatta emerged as the latest example. Labor leader Anthony Albanese’s preferred candidate is economist Andrew Charlton, who lives in Bellevue Hill in the eastern suburbs. Rather than parachute Charlton into the seat, Parramatta Labor branch official Alan Mascarenhas wants a rank-and-file ballot.
Factional deals, derided by those not directly involved in the arduous business of politics, can similarly be a good thing, including for preselections if they arrive at a slate of candidates who reflect the community and who have the knowledge, experience and talent to ensure excellence in government.
Facing massive national challenges should he win the forthcoming election, Albanese’s desire to reinforce his already strong frontbench with further talent is understandable.Presentable, charming and with an Oxford doctorate in economics, what team wouldn’t Andrew Charlton adorn? Leaders are entitled to the odd captain’s pick. Albanese, if he wants to press it, is entitled to this one.