U.S. defends Biden's student debt relief plan in Supreme Court brief

South Africa News News

U.S. defends Biden's student debt relief plan in Supreme Court brief
South Africa Latest News,South Africa Headlines
  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 39 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 97%

The U.S. Justice Department filed a brief with the Supreme Court late on Wednesday defending President Joe Biden's plan to cancel billions of dollars in federal student loans, arguing that two cases lacked standing to challenge the debt relief.

$10,000 in student loan debt for borrowers

The Biden administration estimates that up to 40 million people are eligible for the relief, giving them resources to buy a car or a home or start a family. Republicans insist the plan, estimated to cost about $400 billion, will fuel inflation, which hit 9% last summer but has eased somewhat since then.

The HEROES Act gave the secretary of education the authority to make changes to any provision of applicable student aid program laws after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to alleviate hardships caused by national emergencies. Delinquency and default rates would spike above pre-pandemic levels without relief for lower-income borrowers, the brief said. Householders were also facing "acute inflationary pressures," one of the sources said.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Reuters /  🏆 2. in US

South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Student debt relief: Where borrowers stand as Supreme Court weighs Biden’s planStudent debt relief: Where borrowers stand as Supreme Court weighs Biden’s planIn the months since Biden's student loan forgiveness program was announced, federal student loan holders have been left in the dark about if and when their debt could be canceled after several challenges came forward.
Read more »

Ohio Supreme Court: Cleveland doesn’t have to refund millions in traffic-camera ticketsOhio Supreme Court: Cleveland doesn’t have to refund millions in traffic-camera ticketsICYMI: Last week's 4-3 ruling likely brings an end to a case filed more than 13 years ago, before Cleveland residents voted in 2014 to shut down the city’s traffic-camera program altogether.
Read more »

Gorsuch dissent on Title 42: Supreme Court not ‘policymakers of last resort’Gorsuch dissent on Title 42: Supreme Court not ‘policymakers of last resort’In a recent case before the Supreme Court, several Republican states argued in Arizona v. Mayorkas that the Title 42 orders — which essentially allow the federal government to prevent certain people from coming into the country during a public health emergency because of the fear of communicable disease (in this case, COVID-19) — must remain in place.
Read more »

Supreme Court to hear major Big Tech cases that could reshape internet regulationsSupreme Court to hear major Big Tech cases that could reshape internet regulationsThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments next month in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh, two cases that will weigh the limits of Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which shields Big Tech companies and other online platforms from lawsuits for hosting and moderating user…
Read more »

Will the Supreme Court let lower courts kill charter schools?Will the Supreme Court let lower courts kill charter schools?Academic researchers have been focusing recently on students’ pandemic-induced “learning losses.” But the bigger story, largely being ignored, is the fact that there often wasn’t much “learning” to lose.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-27 05:39:00