Supreme Court Opinions Don’t Have to Be the End of the Fight for Justice

South Africa News News

Supreme Court Opinions Don’t Have to Be the End of the Fight for Justice
South Africa Latest News,South Africa Headlines
  • 📰 TIME
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 43 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 53%

How attorneys pushed back on the flawed 1987 McCleskey decision.

s another season of last-minute U.S. Supreme Court opinions are handed down, Americans are faced with a perennial question: how much compliance is obligatory and how much room is there to disagree?

Justice Powell protected the prerogative of prosecutors because he believed that racial disparities were inevitable in any system that entailed discretion. In the wake of, advocates could have acquiesced to the court’s exceedingly narrow concept of equality, one that refused to see structural inequality, but recognized only isolated acts of individual wrongdoing.

The strategy worked. In the 1987 retrial of George Dungee, a Black man charged in the slaying of a white family in Georgia, the Southern Center insisted that a judge recuse himself because he had used the N-word in open court when referring to a defendant, had supported a segregationist for governor, and was complicit in prosecutorial efforts to remove Black jurors. Accused of being part of a local “system of white dominance,” the judge was forced to step aside.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

TIME /  🏆 93. in UK

South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

US Supreme Court slams door on popular bankruptcy manoeuvreUS Supreme Court slams door on popular bankruptcy manoeuvreBig companies that sought Chapter 11 to manage settlements will be forced to reconsider strategy after Purdue decision
Read more »

Criticism of conservative US Supreme Court judges is wide of the markCriticism of conservative US Supreme Court judges is wide of the markFrom: William Rees, Boroughbridge.
Read more »

US Supreme Court rejects opioid settlement that shields Sackler familyUS Supreme Court rejects opioid settlement that shields Sackler familyThe US Supreme Court on Thursday rejected Purdue Pharma's $6 billion opioids settlement immunizing the Sackler family, which controlled the drugmaker, from future litigation.
Read more »

A strange snafu and a cross-ideological coalition at America’s Supreme CourtA strange snafu and a cross-ideological coalition at America’s Supreme CourtThe justices side with the Biden administration on a social-media tussle, but their biggest rulings are still pending
Read more »

In narrow ruling, US Supreme Court allows emergency abortions in IdahoIn narrow ruling, US Supreme Court allows emergency abortions in IdahoThe US Supreme Court on Thursday cleared the way for women experiencing medical emergencies to obtain abortions in Idaho, but the ruling's narrow scope meant it was a muted victory for reproductive rights activists.
Read more »

The Supreme Court Rejects a Nationwide Opioid Settlement With OxyContin Maker Purdue PharmaThe Supreme Court Rejects a Nationwide Opioid Settlement With OxyContin Maker Purdue PharmaThe Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a nationwide settlement with OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma that would have shielded members of the Sackler family who own the company from civil lawsuits over the toll of opioids but also would have provided billions of dollars to combat the opioid epidemic.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-25 10:49:38