Supreme Court likely to side with South Carolina GOP in racial gerrymandering case

South Africa News News

Supreme Court likely to side with South Carolina GOP in racial gerrymandering case
South Africa Latest News,South Africa Headlines
  • 📰 politico
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 77 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 34%
  • Publisher: 59%

A lower court had ruled that the state’s Republican-drawn map was a racial gerrymander.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority on Wednesday appeared likely to uphold a Republican-drawn congressional district in South Carolina that a lower court found was racially gerrymandered.— tests the legal limits of partisan gerrymandering when it intersects with race. The NAACP is accusing Republican lawmakers of drawing the state’s 1st District, represented by GOP Rep. Nancy Mace, by shuffling Black voters in and out of the district to make it reliably Republican.

The case is the third time in two years that the nation’s top court has heard arguments about states’ congressional lines, once again putting the justices in the position of deciding political boundaries ahead of a big election. The country has a long history of racial gerrymandering, which federal courts still police.

earlier this year, writing that “race was the predominant factor motivating” the new 1st District and that there was an “effective bleaching of African American voters out of the Charleston County portion” of the district.Republicans appealed to the Supreme Court, conceding that— but for partisan, not racial, reasons.

The arguments on Wednesday were remarkable in the fact that nobody — not the attorneys for the state of South Carolina, the NAACP or the Justice Department, nor the justices themselves — questioned what the goal of the South Carolina congressional map was: to give Republicans an advantage in the 1st District. The Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that partisan gerrymandering was.

“Everybody can tell you that if you really want to draw a stable partisan gerrymander, you do not rely on a single presidential year election data,” she said. “They had not only the opportunity — it was sitting there on their computers — but the clear incentive to be looking at this race data, which is certainly more predictive of future voting behavior than a single presidential year election, in which President Trump was the candidate, which further distorts voting behavior.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

politico /  🏆 381. in US

South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

South Carolina Democrat's House bid runs through US Supreme CourtSouth Carolina Democrat's House bid runs through US Supreme CourtSouth Carolina Democrat Michael B. Moore, the great- great-grandson of a Black Civil War hero and pioneering 19th century congressman, is aiming to help his party retake control of the U.S. House of Representatives from Republicans in 2024.
Read more »

Supreme Court set to weigh lines of South Carolina congressional district in racial gerrymandering disputeSupreme Court set to weigh lines of South Carolina congressional district in racial gerrymandering disputeThe Supreme Court will consider whether the lines of South Carolina's Congressional District 1 are an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Read more »

The Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistrictingThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistrictingThe Supreme Court is taking up a new congressional redistricting case, this time from South Carolina, that could shape the fight for partisan control of the House of Representatives
Read more »

The Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistrictingThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistrictingThe Supreme Court is taking up a new congressional redistricting case, this time from South Carolina, that could shape the fight for partisan control of the House of Representatives
Read more »

The Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistrictingThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistrictingThe Supreme Court is taking up a new congressional redistricting case, this time from South Carolina, that could shape the fight for partisan control of the House of Representatives. Arguments taking place at the high court on Wednesday will focus on a coastal district that is held by Republican Rep. Nancy Mace. A lower court ordered the district redrawn after finding that Republicans who control the state Legislature improperly moved Democratic-leaning Black voters into another district to make
Read more »

The Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistrictingThe Supreme Court weighs whether South Carolina targeted Black voters in redistrictingThe Supreme Court is taking up a new congressional redistricting case, this time from South Carolina, that could shape the fight for partisan control of the House of Representatives.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-27 15:44:09