The New York attorney general’s lawsuit against the National Rifle Association is no mere “witch hunt,” a New York judge ruled Friday in dismissing the gun rights advocacy group’s claims that the case is a political vendetta.
NEW YORK — The ruling comes after mass shootings last month in New York and Texas reanimated debate over U.S. gun policy and refocused attention on the NRA.
The NRA accused James in a court filing last year of waging “a blatant and malicious retaliation campaign” because of its views. The group sought to halt the lawsuit.“The narrative that the attorney general’s investigation into these undeniably serious matters was nothing more than a politically motivated — and unconstitutional — witch hunt is simply not supported by the record,” he wrote, noting that the probe was sparked by reports of misconduct and “uncovered additional evidence.
In the wake of the recent shootings in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas, Congress is under renewed pressure to respond after years of partisan logjams over gun legislation. The NRA — a longtime political force that has lost some influence amid financial scandals in recent years — has long insisted that mass shootings are no reason to limit access to guns, arguing that the solution instead is for law-abiding people to have firearms to defend themselves and others.
South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Judge rejects NRA bid to end New York probe into gun rights groupA New York judge on Friday rejected the National Rifle Association's bid to end an investigation by that state's attorney general into alleged corruption at the gun rights group. Justice Joel Cohen of the New York state court in Manhattan said the NRA did not show that Attorney General Letitia James' probe was a politically motivated effort to target the group and silence its speech because she disliked its policies. James, a Democrat, sued the NRA in August 2020, accusing it of diverting millions of dollars to fund luxuries for officials like longtime Chief Executive Wayne LaPierre, using no-show contracts for associates and making other questionable expenses.
Read more »
New York's lawsuit against NRA can move forward, judge rulesA New York judge says the state attorney general’s lawsuit against the National Rifle Association is no mere “witch hunt.”
Read more »
New York's lawsuit against NRA can move forward, judge rulesThe New York attorney general's lawsuit against the NRA is no mere “witch hunt,” a New York judge has ruled in dismissing the gun rights advocacy group's claims that the case is a vendetta. The decision means the nearly 2-year-long legal fight can proceed.
Read more »
New York's lawsuit against NRA can move forward, judge rulesA New York judge says the state attorney general’s lawsuit against the National Rifle Association is no mere “witch hunt.”.
Read more »
New York's lawsuit against NRA can move forward, judge rulesThe case began when Letitia James filed a lawsuit that accused some top NRA executives of financial improprieties.
Read more »
New York's lawsuit against NRA can move forward, judge rulesA New York judge says the state attorney general’s lawsuit against the National Rifle Association is no mere “witch hunt.”.
Read more »