Elon Musk Did Something Remarkable to the Blue Check Mark—Twice

South Africa News News

Elon Musk Did Something Remarkable to the Blue Check Mark—Twice
South Africa Latest News,South Africa Headlines
  • 📰 Slate
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 75 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 33%
  • Publisher: 51%

Some things just shouldn’t be for sale.

Last week, Twitter started removing blue check marks from previously verified accounts that hadn’t paid the $8 monthly fee for its subscription program. Journalists, activists, and scientists—people who once used the platform to debunk COVID-19 misinformation or share election results—found their checks gone. In their place, the check marks filled the profiles of sycophants complaining that their subscriptions to Twitter Blue were not resulting in more engagement on their posts.

The blue check mark on the Twitter profile was an immediately recognizable symbol. Social media symbols are usually brand-associated; the blue check mark was originally associated with Twitter but later adopted by Meta across its products as the symbol for verified accounts, while other platforms have knockoffs, like gray check marks on YouTube.

Before Musk’s takeover of the company, Twitter Blue existed as a subscription service launched in 2021 for limited markets. It included a range of perks, like a time-limited “Undo” button. This sort of subscription model is nothing new, even for otherwise free platforms.But when Musk took the helm in late October, he quickly revamped the subscription service by tethering the blue tick to it—and thus adding another meaning to the symbol.

One of the most visible examples was the fake-but-verified Eli Lilly account, which claimed the company was going to make insulin free. Eli Lilly have been criticized extensively for the high price of insulin—and while the post wasn’t from Eli Lilly, it put the company in an awkward position. Eli Lilly felt it had to deny the tweet, but denying the tweet meant drawing attention to insulin pricing.

This was made worse by the fact that Musk decided to “gift” subscriptions to many accounts , making it appear as though they’d paid for Twitter Blue. This is fraudulent, but somehow especially morally grotesque when it involves claiming that dead people paid for a subscription.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Slate /  🏆 716. in US

South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

The Unstoppable Rise of the Naked Wedding DressThe Unstoppable Rise of the Naked Wedding DressCelebrating in sheer gowns and exposed underwear, brides are no longer playing it safe.
Read more »

Elon Musk’s Comments Might Be ‘Deepfakes,’ Tesla Lawyers ArgueElon Musk’s Comments Might Be ‘Deepfakes,’ Tesla Lawyers ArgueA judge in the Autopilot death case called the defense “deeply troubling.”
Read more »

Tesla lawyers claim Elon Musk’s past statements about self-driving safety could just be deepfakesTesla lawyers claim Elon Musk’s past statements about self-driving safety could just be deepfakesA new way to avoid liability: the deepfake defense
Read more »

Lawyers say Elon Musk 'target for deepfakes' as Tesla Autopilot lawsuit goes to trialLawyers say Elon Musk 'target for deepfakes' as Tesla Autopilot lawsuit goes to trialThe victim's family claims that Autopilot in Tesla's car failed leading to the death of Huang and want Musk to take accountability for his 2016 statement.
Read more »

Elon Musk ordered to testify under oath on Autopilot statementsElon Musk ordered to testify under oath on Autopilot statementsA California judge ordered Tesla CEO Elon Musk to be interviewed under oath about whether he made certain statements regarding the safety and capabilities of Autopilot.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 18:47:39