A divided Supreme Court has ruled that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
FILE - The U.S. Supreme Court is seen, April 25, 2024, in Washington. ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
In a dissent for the liberal members of the court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that civil forfeiture is “vulnerable to abuse” because police departments often have a financial incentive to keep the property. Sutton had loaned her car to a friend. Police in Leesburg, Alabama seized it when they arrested him for trafficking methamphetamine.
U.S. News Washington News Brett Kavanaugh
South Africa Latest News, South Africa Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize propertyA divided Supreme Court has ruled that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
Read more »
Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize propertyA divided Supreme Court has ruled that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners
Read more »
Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize propertyA divided Supreme Court has ruled that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
Read more »
Supreme Court sharply divided over enforcing municipal homeless camping banThe Supreme Court appears deeply conflicted over a city's ban on homeless camping in public spaces that is meant to fight the growing homelessness crisis.
Read more »
Supreme Court appears divided over homeless ban and rights of the unhousedThe decision in an Oregon homelessness case, to be released in June, could be the most far-reaching judgment on the rights of the unhoused in decades.
Read more »
Supreme Court divided on homelessness case that will impact California encampment policyCalifornia cities are looking to the Supreme Court to win more authority to restrict homeless encampments.
Read more »