The couple released a statement three days after judgment was handed down in their favour.
“Social media remains a powerful avenue through which we can empower and educate each other. It is therefore critical that it is not used as an outlet to defame, disparage, and besmirch.”A statement by the NPA averred that husband Romeo testified that the tweet was deeply hurtful; it caused enormous irreparable damage to his reputation and that of hisBasetsana testified in court that the tweet made her feel raw, attacked, violated, and insulted.
On page 105 of the book, Phamotse suggests that the Kumalos have a lot of money and paid the magistrate to rule in their favour. In court, Phamotse testified that she published the tweet as part of her writing process. She further stated that she did not intend to cause harm to anyone.“We are relieved that the saga has now been dispensed with and that our families can start a moment of reflection, healing, and recovery.
“Our children have been devastatingly impacted by these damning allegations. We watched with pain, their psychological beings, social lives and self-esteem taking unimaginable knocks. As businesspeople, our ability to pursue sustainable livelihoods were hamstrung, with some business prospects being brought to a halt.”
The matter has been on the roll for almost five years and sentencing is expected to be handed down on 24 October.Do not miss a single story.